Klappir Platform ▾
Reykjavík City · Education dept. (⌘·K) ▾

Welcome Þorsteinn Svanur

Platform guide
Your current plan is the Impact Plan ⓘ
Embla · AI Assistant
❯_
Ask Embla
Embla is thinking
✓ Query parsed · 75 sites identified
✓ Period defaulted · 12 months (no range given)
✓ 2,200 transactions joined · fee table cross-checked
✓ Anomalies flagged · best peer ranked
1
Rank the worst-performing buildings
Year-round heat loss is concentrated in the oldest stock.
9/24 buildings over 85% summer-to-winter ratio
Potential saving€420k/ yr
Open view
2
Deep-dive the hidden leak
One step-change anomaly drives the biggest single loss.
€1.42M from a single return-line joint
Potential saving€1.06M/ yr
Open view
3
Review overall consumption
Whole-portfolio demand against the peer benchmark.
−37% achievable across the portfolio
Potential saving€2.1M/ yr
Open view
Heating intensity
0 kWh/m²
24 buildings
Annual heat bill
0M €
5-yr meters
Over baseline
0/24
year-round loss
Worst building
0M €
Streampool Elem.
Best case
−37%
proof it works
Heat-loss map · 24 buildings
annual kWh × summer-to-winter ratio · bubble = €/yr loss
healthy elevated year-round loss
Whole portfolio · 24 schoolsMonthly heating demand · metered kWh · 2025
Reykjavík schools · district-heating meters · 41.5 GWh across 24 schools
Monthly
vs Benchmark
By building
Monthly heating demand · 24 schools · 2025
each cell = metered district-heating demand, kWh (darker = higher) · spark = 2025 monthly trend · MWh = annual total
Cross-signal 🏫 Occupancy logs corroborate
Occupancy log shows Streampool heated full overnight & weekends — empty building, full demand. Same answer, different data.
Open audit → ×
PlanRecommended actions
5 years hourly heat-meter data · 24 buildings · weather-normalised
Plan
Owners
Export
1
Roll out night & weekend setback · all 24 buildings
Facilities · controls-only · no capex
2 wks · schedule push
Next step →
Drafts emailto Facilities
Enable night & weekend setback
Buildings heat overnight and at weekends when empty. Push a portfolio-wide setback schedule — no capital works, live in two weeks.
Save
€640k/ yr
Cost
€0
Payback
instant
2
Bring the worst quartile to the peer benchmark
Estates · phased · highest-intensity stock
18 mo · phased
Next step →
Drafts emailto Estates
Phase retrofit · top-quartile buildings
The 6 highest-intensity buildings run ~2× the best-peer benchmark. Scope a zoned envelope + controls retrofit to close the gap — 18 months phased. Building index attached.
Save
€1.1M/ yr
Cost
€1.4M
Payback
~16 mo
3
Live benchmark-drift alerts
Embla · portfolio-wide · live
live · 1 day
Next step →
Sets up alertto Estates lead
Benchmark-drift alert · automated
Embla emails you whenever any building drifts above its peer benchmark — so demand never creeps back up across the 24.
Save
prevention
Cost
€0
Payback
instant
Total recoverable · 24-building portfolio
€2.1M / yr
Every figure traces to a heat meter.
Cost to implement€1.4M
Net Year-1+€700k
Sustained24 months
What Embla did

Traceable reasoning

  • Joined 5 yrs of hourly heat-meter data per building
  • Weather-normalised every reading by degree-days
  • Indexed each building's demand to the best peer (=100)
  • Ranked the gap to benchmark across the portfolio
  • Separated controls-only wins from retrofit ROI
  • Every € traces back to a heat meter
Embla · follow-up
Want me to draft the request to Facilities & brief your estates lead?
Not now
Yes, draft it
S
1 anomaly · Service Centre A2 jumped 37× baseline in June 2025. 9 sites stuck at 80–90% non-recoverable share. Best peer Office O at 37% shows what's possible. summer/winter ratios (pre-1980 envelopes); the other 14 are healthy.
Drill into the outlier →
1 / 6 · Start