Klappir Platform ▾
Kópavogur · Operations & Estates (⌘·K) ▾

Welcome Ólafur Bjarnason

Platform guide
Your current plan is the Impact Plan ⓘ
Embla · AI Assistant
❯_
Ask Embla
Embla is thinking
✓ Query parsed · 75 sites identified
✓ Period defaulted · 12 months (no range given)
✓ 2,200 transactions joined · fee table cross-checked
✓ Anomalies flagged · best peer ranked
1
Deep-dive into service frequency
There are many low-volume pickups that can be avoided.
49% of pickups arrive under 25% full
Potential saving9.7MISK / yr
Open view
2
Look into the biggest waste generators
Tackling these could generate the largest savings.
48% of total mass from just 4 sites
Potential saving13.4MISK / yr
Open view
3
Look at overall landfill waste
Cost is much greater for landfill waste than sorted waste.
73/0% best vs worst site sorting rate
Potential saving10.7MISK / yr
Open view
3-yr spend
0M ISK
75 sites
Mixed waste
0%
8.5 Mkg unsorted
Landfill
0%
61% of CO₂e
Worst offender
0M ISK
Service Centre A
Best case
0%
Office O · proof it works
Opportunity map · 75 sites
annual mass × landfill share · bubble = annual cost
0% landfill 1–10% >10% landfill
Pickup frequency · 75 sitesFill ratio vs best-case benchmark
9,322 pickups · benchmarked vs p95 fill mass per type
All waste
Mixed waste
By site
Best-case vs reality · every site, every pickup
x-axis: avg kg per pickup · y-axis: pickups per year · benchmark line at 1,480 kg (p95) · red zone: pickups arriving <25% full
Pickups arriving half-empty

49% of all pickups · <25% of benchmark fill

9.7M ISK / yr
Pickup-fee burn on chronically underfilled containers across 31 sites — leikskólar, civic offices, small clubs collected weekly when bi-weekly would do.
Site D7 · office96% under · 19 kg avg
Áfangaheimili Dalbrekka95% under · 60 kg avg
Íþróttahús Vatnsendaskóla98% under · 95 kg avg
Hrafninn (Digranes)96% under · 69 kg avg
Bonus · upsize candidates

6 sites running at the ceiling

Schools & pools where ≥80% of mixed-waste pickups exceed the p75 benchmark — bigger containers cut trip count without changing disposal.
6 schools & pools / Versölum (pool)93% heavy · 1,488 kg avg
6 schools & pools93% heavy · 1,133 kg avg
6 schools & pools97% heavy · 784 kg avg
Cross-signal ⛽ Vehicle fuel logs corroborate
Vehicle log shows +62% extra trips to Fuel Depot F tagged "fuel transfer". Same answer, different data.
Open audit → ×
PlanRecommended actions
9,600 transactions · 36 months · disposal fees · pickups · fuel logs
Plan
Owners
Export
1
Reduce pickup frequency at 31 underfilled sites
Operations · Logistics · weekly → bi-weekly
3 wks · contract
Next step →
Drafts emailto Terra waste-services
Reduce pickup frequency · 31 sites
Re-base the 31 attached underfilled sites from weekly to bi-weekly collection — all averaging under 25% of benchmark fill. Site list + fill data attached.
Save
9.7MISK/yr
Cost
0.4MISK
Carbon
−12t CO₂e/yr
2
Upsize bins at 6 constantly-full sites
Estates · vendor · larger containers
4 wks · vendor
Next step →
Drafts emailto Terra waste-services
Upsize containers · 6 sites
6 schools & pools exceed the p75 fill benchmark on most pickups. Please quote larger containers so trip count drops without changing disposal.
Save
0.6MISK/yr
Cost
0.2MISK
Carbon
−2t CO₂e/yr
3
Auto-email alerts on continuous low-fill
Embla · live · automated
live · 1 day
Next step →
Sets up alertto Operations lead
Low-fill alert · automated
Embla emails you whenever a bin records 3+ consecutive pickups under 25% fill — so frequency gets cut before the cost recurs.
Save
prevention
Cost
0ISK
Carbon
prevention
Total recoverable · 31 underfilled sites
10.3M ISK / yr
Every ISK traces to a signed transaction.
Cost to implement~0.6M ISK
Net Year-1+9.7M ISK
Carbon avoided−14 t CO₂e / yr
What Embla did

Traceable reasoning

  • Joined 36 mo of disposal data with the fee table
  • Tagged each transaction by treatment lane
  • Ranked sites by landfill cost
  • Benchmarked pickups vs p95 fill-mass
  • Cross-checked fuel logs for mis-classification
  • Every ISK traces to a signed transaction
Embla · follow-up
Want me to draft the request to Terra waste-services & brief your operations lead?
Not now
Yes, draft it
S
1 anomaly · Service Centre A2 jumped 37× baseline in June 2025. 9 sites stuck at 80–90% non-recoverable share. Best peer Office O at 37% shows what's possible. summer/winter ratios (pre-1980 envelopes); the other 14 are healthy.
Drill into the outlier →
1 / 6 · Start